Is a mist fire suppression system fit-for-purpose in a domestic dwelling?

The short answer is – nobody really knows, and in the Fire Safety regulations Approved Document B, there is no reference to Mist as an option or otherwise.

Indeed, there’s no historical evidence to support their effectiveness in a real domestic environment.

In test cases, a mist system can put out certain fires – but takes considerably longer than a sprinkler.  Furthermore, domestic environments constantly change (doors & windows open/closed, furniture gets moved around) and this can greatly impact the effectiveness of a mist head.

Also, with regards to fire detection and prevention, it’s not simply about meeting regulations —- In this regard, the Grenfell tragedy was a defining moment.  

Above all,  Grenfell has taught us the building industry has a DUTY OF CARE – to ensure that materials and systems installed are appropriate and Fit-for-Purpose.

 

The current fire safety landscape…

Public anger aborted the Grenfell inquiry hearings which started on Monday 2nd March 2020 ….

Grenfell survivors will ‘not settle for anything less’ than prosecutions  – So it’s definitely ramping up!!

Faced with a probable increase in LIABILITY and PROSECUTION if things go wrong, we need to be much more cautious of the marketing hype of suppliers and base ‘critical decisions’ on real-world empirical evidence.

Indeed, the Grenfell enquiry has highlighted possible cases of misleading marketing/sales tactics with respect to materials used for critical elements of construction – and in a similar vein, we have come across a considerable amount of misleading and downright incorrect information relating to mist systems – so caution is strongly advised.

 

The Fire Safety Regulations

All AHJ’s (Authority Having Jurisdiction – such as building inspectors or fire officers) should be aware of the Fire Safety regulations:  Approved Document B volume 1 and Approved Document B volume 2.   Both these documents refer to the installation of sprinklers in accordance with BS9251.  BS9251:2014 is a fully verifiable code of practice which has 3rd party certification of both the components/materials and the actual installations.

There is a Mist code of practice BS8458 but neither ADB volume 1 or ADB volume 2 has any reference to it – and to be very clear, BS8458 is most definitely not equivalent to BS9251

In other words, no AHJ should specify or recommend a mist system to meet the Fire Safety building regulations under ADB1 or ADB 2.

But that’s where Sprinklers come in – because selecting a system that has a long history of saving lives should be the priority.

 

Notwithstanding the above, what are the other key deciding factors…

The environment issues

A mist system can be seriously affected by various environmental conditions.  Open doors or windows or furniture obstructing the mist spray or open spaces etc will definitely have an impact on whether a mist system will or will not work.    Take for example the movement of furniture.  Mist heads are typically set at a low height of around 1.4 – 1.5m up from the floor – how many people will always respect the full direction and span of spray from a mist head in a room when they are moving and replacing furniture?  and what about new owners – will this knowledge be transferred?

These impacting factors are precisely why the BS8458 ‘Application Specific’ standard requires that each and every mist installation is tested in situ to confirm it works as intended – but this can never be guaranteed under all possible installed conditions at the time of installation and in the future.

The complexity issues (the devil is in the detail)

Fact… there are many more potential points of failure in a mist system!!   A sprinkler system with mains fed water supply has no electrical components (other than a dry switch) and no moving parts and everything is working stress free.  But a mist system has a tank and a very high pressure pump, high pressure seals and high pressure pipework running around a building.  There are minute orifices in the mist heads which could get clogged, and some mist heads have scanning/moving parts.  And mist systems generally need an additional fire detector in the ceiling – which can look ugly.  All these components can and do fail!

Indeed component will have a limited life span and will need to be replaced at considerable cost – and annual servicing is a must.  In comparison, a mains fed sprinkler system can easily operate over tens of years without being touched.

  • Mist system have many points of failure – mains fed sprinkler systems have very few by comparison
  • Mist systems are affected by environmental factors such as open spaces and drafts –  sprinklers are not.
  • Mist systems have no third party accreditation.  Sprinklers have full FIRAS accreditation.
  • The the various mist systems are incompatible.  All sprinkler system conforming to BS9251 are compatible.
  • Since all mist systems are different, installation companies are incompatible.    All Sprinkler installers are compatible.

But sprinklers also have another clear advantage – A sprinkler system fed from a mains water supply will be cheaper and more reliable than any mist system – both in the short and longer term.

 

Installation considerations of mist system

Indeed, as described below, the mist standard for domestic / residential BS8458 is far from being as comprehensive and specific as the Sprinkler standard BS9251, and the onus is on the Authority Having Jurisdiction (AHJ) and certified installers to go through a detailed test and confirmation regime to confirm if the proposed system and it’s installation design will be fit-for-purpose in each and every building.  This introduces a significant degree of subjectivity and requires an AHJ to hold specific knowledge of the system in order to quantify and validate the results.  We believe this is quite risky in a critical fire safety application.

Since companies such as ours are relied on to provide a fire suppression system which is always fit for purpose, the issues with mist systems weigh heavily on our choice for any given application.

Comparing the sprinkler standard BS9251 to the mist standard BS8458

The following should be noted…

1. The mist standard  BS8458 is ‘Application Specific’.    It is the ‘Application Specific’ nature of BS8458 amongst other aspects which differentiates it from the sprinkler standard BS9251: 2014 which is not application specific.  Any suggestion they are equivalent is misleading.

2. Currently Mist system components have no certification.  But for most life-critical applications, the third-party certification gives an important stamp of approval.

To install a mist system an installation checklist should be followed and the affects of the surrounding environmental conditions taken into account.   The ‘Mist system installation checklist’ differentiates the installation from sprinkler systems which have no need for such a requirement.

The Mist system installation checklist* as recommended by the British Automatic Fire Sprinkler Association (BAFSA):

  • Has the system been tested and approved by a third party approval body such as LPCB, VdS, UL or FM for the specific application intended?
  • Has all testing been carried out by a capable laboratory such as BRE, FM, UL, SINTEF, VdS, SP, VTT or CNPP?
  • Are products and components specific to the system approved for such use by a qualified third party approval body?
  • Can all claims made by the system supplier be verified?
  • Is there a formal agreement between manufacturer and installer?
  • Has the installer received training from the manufacturer?
  • Does the testing and approval data correspond to the intended use of the system?
  • Does the geometry of the space to be protected, including ceiling height, correspond to the testing and approval data?
  • Where insurers are the AHJ, ensure compliance with the insurer’s requirements /questionnaire / checklist.

*Extracted from British Automatic Fire Sprinkler Association – Information leaflet

Why are Mist systems application specific – it’s not possible to establish the fire suppression performance of a mist system until it is tested and/or analysed as an installed system in the particular building.   This is because of the environmental factors which can affect the correct operation.  An simple example would be a significant draft (perhaps caused by open windows or doors) occurring in the vicinity of the mist head which could affect the mist jet and whether the fire is in a larger open area where the mist could dissipate too quickly away from the fire.  Another could be that the resident has put something in the way of the mist head.

A closed environment (such as a plant & Machinery room) will likely remain closed during a fire outbreak so a mist system should work well – but is a room with people – doors and windows will get opened.   See the demo videos on this page of a sprinkler system and a mist system in operation and make your own mind up.

As a last note, the importance of using manufacturers and certified installers who have been in business for a good while, with sound knowledge and capability is crucial – very few companies will take over responsibility of installation by suppliers who may come and go.  So you could be left with a system that no-one wants to maintain or service.

A well known review website has this to say about a particular mist system..  https://uk.trustpilot.com/review/www.mistsafetyuk.co.uk

More Information

Information

 

Domestic Sprinklers Cornwall Limited

Fully Certified Fire Safety Systems

You'll find our Automatic Fire Sprinkler systems in all types of buildings - including new-builds & existing buildings, Domestic Homes, Blocks of Flats, Social Housing, Care Homes etc